Park ward

Vote share over time

Each line is a party's lead candidate as a share of ballots cast. Hollow points are by-elections.

07/05/2026

Party Candidate Votes Share +/−
Liberal Democrats Richard William James Brown Elected 1,515 48.2% +9.8
Reform UK Michael Jerrom 523 16.6% +0.6
Conservative and Unionist Party David Scott 497 15.8% -1.9
Tunbridge Wells Alliance Nick Pope 268 8.5% -7.9
Green Party Alasdair James Milner Fraser 250 8.0% +0.9
Labour Party Stephen Burgess 91 2.9% -1.4
Majority992
Turnout46.6%
Registered electors6,748
Ballots cast3,144

Liberal Democrats hold

01/05/2025 By-election

Party Candidate Votes Share +/−
Liberal Democrats Richard William James Brown Elected 973 38.4% -6.0
Conservative and Unionist Party Sedat Zorba 448 17.7% -9.1
Tunbridge Wells Alliance Nick Pope 416 16.4% -14.6
Reform UK John Spence 405 16.0% +8.2
Green Party Jeremy Audsley Clapham 179 7.1% -8.5
Labour Party Kate McAlpine 110 4.3% -7.8
Majority525
Turnout37.0%
Registered electors6,688
Ballots cast2,532

Liberal Democrats hold

02/05/2024 3 seats

Party Candidate Votes Share +/−
Liberal Democrats Matt Lowe Elected 1,240 44.5% —
Liberal Democrats Corinna Keefe Elected 1,076 38.6% —
Liberal Democrats Tara Matthews Elected 1,009 36.2% —
Tunbridge Wells Alliance Nick Pope 864 31.0% —
Conservative and Unionist Party Bob Atwood 747 26.8% —
Conservative and Unionist Party Andrew Hobart 712 25.5% —
Conservative and Unionist Party Sedat Zorba 689 24.7% —
Green Party Alasdair James Milner Fraser 434 15.6% —
Labour Party Sue Pound 339 12.2% —
Labour Party Jack Faulkner 309 11.1% —
Reform UK Michael Jerrom 216 7.7% —
Majority145
Turnout42.0%
Registered electors6,616
Ballots cast2,788

04/05/2023 Estimated

This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.

PartyEstimated share
Tunbridge Wells Alliance 30%
Conservative and Unionist Party 29%
Liberal Democrats 23%
Labour Party 11%
Green Party 7%

Reconstructed from Park (81%), Pantiles and St Mark's (19%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.

05/05/2022 Estimated

This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.

PartyEstimated share
Conservative and Unionist Party 32%
Tunbridge Wells Alliance 29%
Liberal Democrats 26%
Labour Party 11%
Green Party 1%
The Socialist Party of Great Britain 0%

Reconstructed from Park (81%), Pantiles and St Mark's (19%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.

06/05/2021 Estimated

This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.

PartyEstimated share
Conservative and Unionist Party 36%
Liberal Democrats 24%
Tunbridge Wells Alliance 20%
Labour Party 12%
Green Party 9%

Reconstructed from Park (81%), Pantiles and St Mark's (19%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.

02/05/2019 Estimated

This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.

PartyEstimated share
Tunbridge Wells Alliance 38%
Liberal Democrats 29%
Conservative and Unionist Party 23%
Labour Party 8%
UK Independence Party (UKIP) 4%
Green Party 1%
Women's Equality Party 1%

Reconstructed from Park (81%), Pantiles and St Mark's (19%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.

03/05/2018 Estimated

This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.

PartyEstimated share
Conservative and Unionist Party 32%
Tunbridge Wells Alliance 27%
Liberal Democrats 26%
Labour Party 15%

Reconstructed from Park (81%), Pantiles and St Mark's (19%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.

05/05/2016 Estimated

This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.

PartyEstimated share
Conservative and Unionist Party 52%
Labour Party 18%
Liberal Democrats 17%
UK Independence Party (UKIP) 13%
Green Party 2%

Reconstructed from Park (81%), Pantiles and St Mark's (19%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.