Hazel Grove ward
Vote share over time
Each line is a party's lead candidate as a share of ballots cast. Hollow points are by-elections.
07/05/2026
| Party | Candidate | Votes | Share | +/− |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | Wendy Meikle Elected | 1,742 | 37.4% | -4.7 |
| Reform UK | John Howard Kelly | 1,662 | 35.7% | — |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Tim Morley | 524 | 11.2% | -14.6 |
| Green Party | Dave Shearman | 470 | 10.1% | -1.0 |
| Labour Party | Johnny White | 261 | 5.6% | -15.3 |
| Majority | 80 | |||
| Turnout | 43.7% | |||
| Registered electors | 10,683 | |||
| Ballots cast | 4,659 | |||
Liberal Democrats hold
02/05/2024
| Party | Candidate | Votes | Share | +/− |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | Frankie Singleton Elected | 1,524 | 42.1% | -10.3 |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Tim Morley | 937 | 25.9% | -3.2 |
| Labour Party | Johnny White | 757 | 20.9% | -1.4 |
| Green Party | Fiona Bullock | 401 | 11.1% | -0.7 |
| Majority | 587 | |||
| Turnout | — | |||
| Registered electors | — | |||
| Ballots cast | 3,619 | |||
Liberal Democrats hold
04/05/2023 3 seats
| Party | Candidate | Votes | Share | +/− |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | Jake Austin Elected | 1,662 | 52.4% | — |
| Liberal Democrats | Wendy Meikle Elected | 1,596 | 50.3% | — |
| Liberal Democrats | Frankie Singleton Elected | 1,458 | 46.0% | — |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | William Robert Law | 924 | 29.1% | — |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Andrew Baker | 891 | 28.1% | — |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Elizabeth Rose Eveleigh Arnold | 891 | 28.1% | — |
| Labour Party | Carl Carrigan | 708 | 22.3% | — |
| Labour Party | Linda Joyce Paton | 544 | 17.2% | — |
| Labour Party | Johnny White | 468 | 14.8% | — |
| Green Party | Mary Fiona Bullock | 375 | 11.8% | — |
| Majority | 534 | |||
| Turnout | — | |||
| Registered electors | — | |||
| Ballots cast (estimated) | 3,172 | |||
05/05/2022 Estimated
This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.
| Party | Estimated share |
|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 47% |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | 31% |
| Labour Party | 17% |
| Green Party | 4% |
| Reform UK | 1% |
Reconstructed from Hazel Grove (68%), Offerton (31%), Stepping Hill (2%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.
06/05/2021 Estimated
This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.
| Party | Estimated share |
|---|---|
| Conservative and Unionist Party | 40% |
| Liberal Democrats | 37% |
| Labour Party | 19% |
| Green Party | 4% |
| Reform UK | 1% |
Reconstructed from Hazel Grove (68%), Offerton (31%), Stepping Hill (2%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.
02/05/2019 Estimated
This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.
| Party | Estimated share |
|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 50% |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | 26% |
| Labour Party | 13% |
| UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 6% |
| Green Party | 6% |
Reconstructed from Hazel Grove (68%), Offerton (31%), Stepping Hill (2%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.
03/05/2018 Estimated
This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.
| Party | Estimated share |
|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 46% |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | 34% |
| Labour Party | 17% |
| Green Party | 3% |
Reconstructed from Hazel Grove (68%), Offerton (31%), Stepping Hill (2%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.
05/05/2016 Estimated
This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.
| Party | Estimated share |
|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 38% |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | 29% |
| Labour Party | 18% |
| UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 13% |
| Green Party | 3% |
Reconstructed from Hazel Grove (68%), Offerton (31%), Stepping Hill (2%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.