Jesmond ward
Vote share over time
One contest on record. The trend chart appears once a second election is counted.
07/05/2026 3 seats
| Party | Candidate | Votes | Share | +/− |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | Philip Browne Elected | 1,570 | 45.0% | — |
| Liberal Democrats | James Coles Elected | 1,527 | 43.8% | — |
| Liberal Democrats | Peter John Allen Elected | 1,451 | 41.6% | — |
| Green Party | Marianne Elizabeth Kell | 1,147 | 32.9% | — |
| Green Party | Tim Dowson | 1,083 | 31.1% | — |
| Green Party | Ludovico Rella | 1,001 | 28.7% | — |
| Labour Party | Killian McCartney | 494 | 14.2% | — |
| Labour Party | Fin Weatherill | 435 | 12.5% | — |
| Labour Party | John Thomas White | 420 | 12.0% | — |
| Reform UK | Ellen Russell | 316 | 9.1% | — |
| Reform UK | Trevor Anthony Cox | 316 | 9.1% | — |
| Reform UK | Janet Christine Stansfield | 307 | 8.8% | — |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | Sandra Denise Davison | 169 | 4.8% | — |
| Majority | 304 | |||
| Turnout | 50.2% | |||
| Registered electors | 6,960 | |||
| Ballots cast | 3,486 | |||
02/05/2024 Estimated
This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.
| Party | Estimated share |
|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 40% |
| Labour Party | 36% |
| Green Party | 16% |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | 7% |
| Social Democratic Party | 1% |
Reconstructed from North Jesmond (65%), South Jesmond (35%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.
04/05/2023 Estimated
This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.
| Party | Estimated share |
|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 51% |
| Labour Party | 33% |
| Green Party | 10% |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | 6% |
| Social Democratic Party | 2% |
Reconstructed from North Jesmond (65%), South Jesmond (35%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.
05/05/2022 Estimated
This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.
| Party | Estimated share |
|---|---|
| Labour Party | 49% |
| Liberal Democrats | 32% |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | 9% |
| Green Party | 9% |
| Reform UK | 1% |
Reconstructed from North Jesmond (65%), South Jesmond (35%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.
06/05/2021 Estimated
This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.
| Party | Estimated share |
|---|---|
| Labour Party | 42% |
| Liberal Democrats | 27% |
| Green Party | 15% |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | 14% |
| The North East Party | 1% |
| Reform UK | 1% |
Reconstructed from North Jesmond (65%), South Jesmond (35%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.
02/05/2019 Estimated
This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.
| Party | Estimated share |
|---|---|
| Liberal Democrats | 40% |
| Labour Party | 31% |
| Green Party | 18% |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | 11% |
| Communist Party of Britain | 0% |
Reconstructed from North Jesmond (65%), South Jesmond (35%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.
03/05/2018 Estimated
This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.
| Party | Estimated share |
|---|---|
| Labour Party | 52% |
| Liberal Democrats | 34% |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | 15% |
| Green Party | 15% |
| Communist Party of Britain | 1% |
Reconstructed from North Jesmond (65%), South Jesmond (35%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.
05/05/2016 Estimated
This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.
| Party | Estimated share |
|---|---|
| Labour Party | 47% |
| Liberal Democrats | 30% |
| Conservative and Unionist Party | 10% |
| Green Party | 9% |
| UK Independence Party (UKIP) | 4% |
Reconstructed from North Jesmond (65%), South Jesmond (35%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.