Wembley Central ward

Vote share over time

Each line is a party's lead candidate as a share of ballots cast. Hollow points are by-elections.

07/05/2026 3 seats

Party Candidate Votes Share +/−
Liberal Democrats Daniel Brown Elected 1,918 36.5% +15.2
Liberal Democrats Hetal Jansali Elected 1,824 34.7% —
Liberal Democrats Jigar Shah Elected 1,742 33.2% —
Conservative and Unionist Party Rajan Arasu-Seelan 1,603 30.5% +4.9
Conservative and Unionist Party Ryan D'Souza 1,568 29.8% —
Conservative and Unionist Party Sushil Rapatwar 1,503 28.6% —
Labour Party Sonia Shah 1,035 19.7% -43.5
Labour Party Ketan Sheth 971 18.5% —
Labour Party Anita Thakkar 848 16.1% —
Green Party Marina McIntyre 516 9.8% —
Reform UK Jayeshkumar Patel 495 9.4% —
Green Party Caren Lisbeth Wynn Owen 444 8.5% —
Reform UK Irene Lobo 441 8.4% —
Green Party Miranda Shakti Persaud 441 8.4% —
Reform UK Brijesh Dokwal 411 7.8% —
Majority139
Turnout—
Registered electors—
Ballots cast (estimated)5,253

Liberal Democrats gain from Labour Party · Liberal Democrats gain from Labour Party · Liberal Democrats gain from Labour Party

05/05/2022 3 seats

Party Candidate Votes Share +/−
Labour Party Sonia Shah Elected 2,658 63.2% —
Labour Party Rajan Arasu-Seelan Elected 2,560 60.9% —
Labour Party Ketan Sheth Elected 2,388 56.8% —
Conservative and Unionist Party Mahendra Negi 1,079 25.7% —
Conservative and Unionist Party Wilhelmina Calista Mitchell-Murray 1,040 24.7% —
Liberal Democrats David Clement Johnson 896 21.3% —
Conservative and Unionist Party Riyaz Parvin Shaik 753 17.9% —
Liberal Democrats Afifa Majid 658 15.6% —
Liberal Democrats Robert Wharton 585 13.9% —
Majority1,309
Turnout—
Registered electors—
Ballots cast (estimated)4,206

03/05/2018 Estimated

This ward's boundary changed, so nobody stood in it at this election. 100% of the ward is accounted for.

PartyEstimated share
Labour Party 68%
Conservative and Unionist Party 19%
Liberal Democrats 16%
Green Party 8%

Reconstructed from Wembley Central (69%), Alperton (18%), Sudbury (13%). No hold or gain is shown: there is no comparable earlier result.